when regiment is gone (kindkit) wrote,
when regiment is gone
kindkit

LJ gender fail

LiveJournal is about to change its code in a way that will force everyone to specify their gender as either "male" or "female." "Unspecified" will no longer be an option. It will be possible to hide your gender on your profile, but you'll still have to specify on your account. (This may only affect new accounts--I'm not entirely clear on this.)

LJ is almost certainly taking this step as a way to gather demographic information for advertising purposes.

For more information about the change, see Synecdochic's post here (on DreamWidth).

If you'd like to make your opinion known to LJ, you can fill out the feedback form here. (Please be polite; insults don't help, and as Synecdochic points out, the people who read and pass along feedback are not the ones making the crappy decisions.) Here's what I said in my feedback:
I am dismayed to see that LiveJournal is eliminating account holders' option to list their gender as "unspecified"; from now on everyone must select either male or female.

This bothers me for two reasons. First, not everyone identifies as male or female. Requiring a binary choice erases the identities of genderqueer and androgynous people, and that hurts them. This retrograde step makes LiveJournal less of a safe space for people whose identities are often under threat.

Second, everyone should have the right not to reveal their gender online. And even though the code change allows one's gender to be hidden from public view, people are still being forced to specify to LiveJournal itself. The *only* reason I can think of for LJ to do that is that LJ wants additional demographic information for its advertisers. Once again, LJ is choosing to value advertisers over subscribers.

I've been a paid LJ member since 2003; I've stuck with LJ through a lot of changes that I haven't always liked very much. But if LJ starts forcing people to (a) choose a binary gender, and (b) reveal it for the sake of LJ's demographic statistics, I will not be inclined to renew my paid account.

Please allow account holders to keep their gender unspecified.


This code change is likely to go through very soon, so LJ needs to hear from a lot of us, fast.

ETA: LJ is backpedaling furiously responding to say that the code push wasn't final and they don't intend to eliminate "unspecified" as an option.
Tags: gender, lj issues
Subscribe

  • I think I have read some of those books

    From the Department of "It's Funny Because It's True": How Many Male SFF Novelists Does It Take to Change a Lightbulb? Crossposted at…

  • "I'm a boy" covers?

    Does anyone know of a cover version of The Who's I'm a Boy by either a woman singer or a trans* man singer whose vocal range still sounds "female"?…

  • sex, gender, and the Doctor

    The announcement of the Twelfth Doctor's casting has again led to dismay for people who would like the next Doctor to be a woman. I have to confess…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 11 comments

  • I think I have read some of those books

    From the Department of "It's Funny Because It's True": How Many Male SFF Novelists Does It Take to Change a Lightbulb? Crossposted at…

  • "I'm a boy" covers?

    Does anyone know of a cover version of The Who's I'm a Boy by either a woman singer or a trans* man singer whose vocal range still sounds "female"?…

  • sex, gender, and the Doctor

    The announcement of the Twelfth Doctor's casting has again led to dismay for people who would like the next Doctor to be a woman. I have to confess…